It has been a while since I updated my blog, it is not because I couldn’t find an interesting topic to blog about but instead, there were many topics to start with. I had to read through each and every hot topics ranging from the Hudud news, Tun Mahathir’s bad use of metaphor (I really find this guy cool actually) to describe UMNO, Chua Soi Lek’s ramblings, the Voter’s mentality issues and the nonsensical “pingpong-ing” finger pointing between ruling and opposition parties on being spin doctors.
Like every women, I wish I can buy all the shoes in that shop but instead I will pick the one that catches my eye the most. (So I lied, I normally buy a minimum of 2 pairs at one go).
 |
| taken from http://mahwengkwai.com |
Therefore out of the few hot topics mentioned, I’ve decided to pick a topic about the odd “amended new” rule in which you are found guilty until proven innocent; which is the total opposite of justice whereby a person is innocent until ‘PROVEN’ guilty. I am sure that most of us know what Section 114A is about and I do not need to sound like a broken recorder singing the same tune like some brain-washing machine and how this managed to spark my interest in picking this topic is
THIS
(The Star) - Section 114A of the Evidence Act cannot be used in the case of Umno Youth's alleged seditious posting because the amendment is based on presumption of fact and not presumption of guilt, said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz.
“The amendment is only a form of procedure."
“It can only be invoked if a person is charged under other laws and the court is convinced to use it to shift the burden of proof to the accused,” he told a press conference Thursday.
Nazri said the accused can then prove their innocence through a balance of probabilities, as how Umno Youth has done by making a police report as soon as possible
When seeing the title of this piece of news, a non UMNO or BN supporter would be enraged. However I found this to be a loop-hole, a very good one in which I will dissect it based on my own understanding and view.
“Because the amendment is based on presumption of fact and not presumption of guilt, said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz.”
My take: therefore you must have a lot of paperwork in which histories or bookmarks are to be in print screen and in hard-copied print, in order to collect as much evidence as you can. I believe this can be a part of evidence collected if the time comes.
“Nazri said the accused can then prove their innocence through a balance of probabilities, as how Umno Youth has done by making a police report as soon as possible.”
My view: To be on the safe side without being caught unknowingly, once you have gathered all evidences from your side, i.e. histories, log files, if you don’t know how to capture logs? Try cobian they are free.
If you are paranoid to be prosecuted for something you did not do because of such law like section 114A, lodge a police report on a daily basis or weekly with the “PRESUMPTION” to save your own behind and do bring along your FACTS and EVIDENCES in which a saved soft copy of computer logs, print screen printed in hard copy of histories and bookmarks and also, a picture of you posing by your computer to show it isn’t edited.
Upon seeing how this section 114A act reflects to my 'Presumption of Fact', is that the internet people are far more dangerous than those snatch thieves, smash and grab thieves and child rapists. Oh speaking of child rapists, did I mention that in Malaysia, a court judge let a guy who admitted guilty of raping a 13 year old girl when he was 18 years that time, scott free because he had a bright future as an athlete?
By the way, I have been reading a lot from Malaysia Today, it truly has proper news than most of the other independent news site these days.
http://www.malaysia-today.net/
That is if you are looking for news that are well balanced and no Pro-UMNO/BN or Pro-Opposition parties.